Outsourcing Vs Offshoring: is there a clear winner?
The growing demand for specialties like IT and software engineering in the West — combined with an eruption of talent in Asia, has caused ‘offshoring’ and ‘outsourcing’ to become major business buzzwords.
While many think they’re just two vague words meaning ‘giving your work to someone else’, this couldn’t be further from reality. The line can become blurred, with some even combining the two as ‘offshore outsourcing’, but while both share the characteristic of remote working, outsourcing and offshoring represent two utterly contrasting business models. In this piece, we compare outsourcing vs offshoring, and the benefits and drawbacks of each model within specific types of business.
Ever considered growing your team using a global workforce? Read on to find out whether outsourcing or offshoring is the best fit for your company.
The evolution of outsourcing and offshoring
The Industrial Revolution radically changed how businesses operated. Highly productive machinery and breakthrough technologies meant that companies could grow at an unprecedented rate. By the mid-1900s, many were thinking outside the box, looking for any angle to increase profits and grow their market share.
Technology was now so powerful that by simply scaling up operations, companies could leverage massive economies of scale to increase profit margins while undercutting smaller rivals. Unfortunately, this scaling usually led to a bloated and complex management structure, and with it a total lack of agility and flexibility.
Struggling with having their cake and eating it, companies decided to focus on their core business and began to ‘outsource’ their support functions. This move made it easier for companies that weren’t self-sufficient or had no internal competency to outsource to third-party vendors on a contract basis, forming the baseline of outsourcing.
Fast-forward to the 1990s. Outsourcing, as a cost-saving measure, was as popular as ever. Contracts were drawn, timelines set and what seemed like smooth and hassle-free delivery of services was established.
The outsourcing model of the 90’s worked amazingly well, and companies were more than happy with the results. However, their expectations began to rise, and they wanted more. The one thing that outsourcing couldn’t give them was a sense of ownership, and they wanted to be in charge of the entirety of their business. Thus began the search for a business model that was cost-efficient, scalable, and gave business owners complete control and ownership. The ethics of offshoring slowly, but surely began to shift.
At the turn of the 20th century, offshoring came into play.
What makes outsourcing and offshoring so popular today?
Before we dive into the pros and cons of each business model, it’s important to look at the major reasons why businesses today — both large and small — are relying on outsourcing and offshoring more than ever. Here are a few of the main ones:
1) Acute shortage of talent
Recent studies have shown that the talent shortage in the UK has doubled over the last decade. This massive talent shortage means companies have to look elsewhere to source talent.
The last decade has seen more and more firms establish a global presence. Setting up remote teams sets new trends in business on an international scale. Globalisation therefore facilitates economic growth and competitiveness, and offshoring vs outsourcing is merely a consequence.
3) The need for innovation
The rapidly changing market and the need to build innovative products and services further popularised offshoring and outsourcing.
4) They broke the mould
While in-house businesses seemed to be working fine, the operation of such an enterprise was often rigid and frail because of the sheer amount of work that needed to be done. Manufacturing and sales became a tedious process with little to no changes. Companies began to realise that outsourcing and offshoring offered a way to break free from traditional business models and, quite possibly, generate significant returns for the business.
The key benefits of both models
A stand-out advantage of outsourcing is the flexibility that comes with it. Let’s say a company builds an offshore finance team. That team is permanently employed, and so even if it’s a quiet period and there’s no real work to be done, you’re still paying them for sitting around twiddling thumbs. Outsourcing, on the other hand, can be managed as little as a few hours or days at a time — they only work when you actually need them. This level of flexibility is particularly important for companies whose work is more sporadic.
Outsourcing is a business model that usually comes with low cost and therefore significant savings. For example, the cost of maintaining infrastructure and administration are almost completely eliminated, making it a very budget-friendly approach. According to a study conducted by Deloitte, outsourcing functions to an external party reduce the total cost by almost 45%.
There are countless business functions in every company, many of which are non-core activities; ones which don’t offer any distinct advantage over competitors. These non-core functions can distract key team members from focusing on their primary tasks, therefore wasting resources. Outsourcing to a third party means you can focus completely on your core competencies — a real boon to the company!
In the offshore business model, unlike with outsourcing, the company keeps full control over their core business. The responsibility of recruiting a stellar offshore team, then directing and training them, lies entirely in their hands.
One major benefit of taking a business offshore is access to a massive pool of talent. There is immense pressure in developed countries to discover and recruit individuals with the right skill set, especially in software development and production.
Countries like India and the Philippines put major emphasis on educating and training its people; the result is a huge number of skilled, well-educated, and English-speaking talents just waiting to be hired. That’s the quality offshoring gives you.
Cost-cutting is undoubtedly the most significant factor that drives companies to look into offshoring. Offshore teams in countries like India are incredibly talented and passionate about what they do. Because of the lower cost of living compared to the West, offshoring allows companies to access this exceptional talent without the same huge costs as at home.
Offshoring and scalability go hand-in-hand. By successfully building offshore teams, a company establishes remote centres in different parts of the world. This provides a great opportunity for the company to scale its business, supporting clients whenever and wherever they need it.
The cons of both models
- Loss of control
When a company outsources to an external team, it inevitably loses some control over how the work is being conducted. This could lead to poor communication and visibility between the company and the team, potentially undermining the success of the whole project.
- Hidden costs
Though outsourcing on a contract basis always appears cost-effective, companies must always be prepared for any hidden costs which the vendor might bill them for at a later date. Companies frequently pay above their initial agreement on account of the work done being ‘out of scope’.
By focusing too heavily on cheap costs, it’s also very easy to hire people without the necessary skills for the job, resulting in a lower-quality product or service than expected.
- Lack of customer focus
Your outsourcing partner may be catering to several other businesses at once. This makes it impossible to expect 100% focus and attention from them. Again, the company risks receiving products or services that are not quite up to the mark.
- Geographical distance
Sometimes, collaborating with a team in a different time zone can be challenging. When the necessary tools and procedures are implemented poorly, it can lead to delivery lags and a resultant slower time to market of products and services. This is offset by an experienced offshore partner who’ll ensure the means of collaboration are properly implemented.
Outsourcing vs offshoring: the better model?
Finding the right balance between distributing core and non-core competencies of a business is not always easy. Both outsourcing and offshoring come with their own benefits and drawbacks.
For short-term projects that don’t last for more than a couple of months, high-quality outsourcing is usually the strongest option.
However, if you’re a company looking to enhance your operations by building a team hand-picked from a deep pool of talent — while still retaining complete control of the process, then offshoring is the way to go. In fact, we, at The Scalers offer Offshoring 2.0 — the new generation of offshoring that focuses on building stellar development teams by hiring nothing but the best talents for businesses across the globe.
There are a few challenges that you may need to overcome, but the end result is that you get to work with a team that you can call your own. Furthermore, by directly collaborating with the offshore team, an efficient workflow can be established without compromising on the output quality.
But quality offshoring requires the assistance and guidance of experts in the field; experienced technology professionals who can help you start offshore development in the right way.
If you’d like to learn more about how offshoring could be leveraged to grow your business, reach out and schedule a free consultation with one of our experts.
Is offshoring good or bad?
Going offshore to gain access to a large talent pool, while significantly reducing costs makes the concept of offshoring to countries like India lucrative for businesses all across the globe.
What is offshore outsourcing?
Offshore outsourcing is when companies engage with third party vendors in foreign countries to deliver software that they don’t internally have the capacity to.
Why would a company choose to implement outsourcing or offshoring?
The primary reasons why companies choose to implement outsourcing or offshoring is to reduce the cost of operations, find talent, and focus on their core business.